Words of Art and the Veil of Deception:

FOREIGN OFFICE OF ORIGIN [19 USC § 1304]
non-domestic, non-resident, non-U.S. citizen
Sui Generis, Sui Juris, in Jus Personarum,
sojourning without the United States
[28 USC § 1746 (1) & 8 USC § 1101]
_________________________________
ZIP^™ exempt [DMM 602 1.3e]

Words of Art and the Veil of Deception:
Exposing Legalese Trickery in
“No Undercover FBI Employees Were Present”

 

First and foremost reader, DO NOT interpret my usage of filthy esquire “slick Willy’s” statement of: “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” as some sort of repugnant “partisan” sycophant standing as, this Author maintains absolutely no Un-Clean-Handed (filthy) “political”, “religious” or “commercial”affiliations and, ALL materials/works Authored by me are solely managed by myself as Author and not under any repugnant “LLC” or “©”. Rather, my usage of “slick Willy’s”  words reflect my consummate exploration of how linguistics, etymology, context, and interpretation intersect in Real-life/REALITY and not the UN-sanity of the populace’s belief in Commercial Legal Fictions. Because, this kind of linguistic precision is significant for anyone concerned with navigating complex systems, whether in actual law (which is NOT the same as “legal” or “codes”, “statutes”, “rules and regulations”), philosophy, or daily DEDUCTIVE reasoning rather than that QUACKademic inductive reasoning designed for in-DOCTOR-nation purposes.

Essentially, instead of getting “triggered” because my… NON-existent partisan ideology is “offended”, I simply decode and “register” with my near “photographic memory” literally EVERYTHING the talking heads spew out as a “Public Service Announcement” (PSA). So, Billy Boy’s quote is simply nothing but a PSA signaling the dangers of his “legal industry’s” filthy “Words of Art” also known as “Legalese”. Thus, no BODY can tell me that this is not only “wise”, but sharply analytical on my part (all explained towards the end of this material).

With that “Disclaimer” out of the way and to get to the crux of the topic at hand, One must put emotions aside and grasp the FACT that in the pantheon of govern-MENTAL-ism, the repugnant and Un-Clean-Handed Commercial B.A.R.-tool’s (ABA) and American Judges Associations (AJA) “Words of Art” and doublespeak, few statements are as insulting to the intelligence of a law scholar—or any critical thinker/truther—as the recent report stating: “No Undercover FBI Employees Were Present at Jan. 6 Capitol Riot”. This carefully worded assertion, while appearing factual, reeks of semantic sleight-of-hand designed to mislead.

 

Unpacking the Deception

The statement’s credibility crumbles when analyzed through the lens of statutory definitions and legal constructs. The focus on the term “employees” is not accidental; it is a calculated legal maneuver meant to obscure the broader reality. It conveniently ignores the distinct role of agents, which includes operatives such as undercover officers, confidential informants, and contractors authorized to act under the FBI’s direction.

 

Defining “FBI Employee”

Under 5 U.S.C. § 2105, an employee is defined as:

• • An individual appointed in the civil service,
  • Performing a federal function under lawful authority,
  • Subject to the supervision of an appointing officer.

Employees are directly hired and salaried personnel, bound by federal employment regulations outlined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 11—Office of Personnel Management—and 5 C.F.R. § 731.101, which governs their suitability and conduct​​.

 

What is an “FBI Agent”?

In stark contrast, an “agent” is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary as someone authorized to act on behalf of a principal. This includes special agents, confidential informants, and other operatives who act under explicit, often covert, instructions. They are not always bound by the formalities of civil service but operate under agency law principles that emphasize discretion and limited authority.

 

Framework Differentiating the Terms

1. 1. 5 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(2) excludes certain categories of individuals, such as temporary agents and contractors, from being considered employees.
   2. Federal common law and precedent cases, such as United States v. Dotterweich, 320 U.S. 277 (1943), and Steele v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 323 U.S. 192 (1944), emphasize the distinct liabilities and functions of employees versus agents​​.

 

Weaponized Semantics: the True Intent Behind the Statement

By exclusively addressing “employees”, the report sidesteps whether FBI agents, informants, or other operatives were present. This is not a benign oversight; it is a deliberate obfuscation. Such wordplay constitutes “words of art”—a technique used by the filthy B.A.R. association/esquires to mislead without outright lying. It exploits the uninformed public’s reliance on plain language while adhering to narrowly defined legal truths.

 

Lawful/Legal Implications: Charges and Violations

The dissemination of such deceptive propaganda is not just unethical—it potentially violates laws designed to protect the integrity of governmental communication and safeguard the public. Consider the following charges:

1. Treason:
   • Under Your 18 U.S.C. § 2381, treason includes levying war against the United States or aiding its enemies. While the statement may not rise to this level, if it obscures actions undermining national security or violating constitutional principles, it edges dangerously close.
2. Domestic Terrorism:
   • Defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2331 as acts intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence government policy, or affect government conduct through intimidation or mass deception. By sowing confusion and obstructing transparency, such statements could qualify as psychological intimidation against an informed citizenry.
3. Obstruction of Justice:
   • Your 18 U.S.C. § 1505 criminalizes actions that obstruct investigations or proceedings. If the intent of the language is to derail accountability, it potentially falls under this statute.
4. Abuse of Power:
   • The deliberate use of misleading language to obscure federal activity undermines the public’s ability to hold government agencies accountable, a violation of the core principles of administrative law.

 

Historical Parallels: a Tradition of Deception

This is not the first instance of linguistic trickery used to shield the truth. Historical analyses, such as Mitchell Innes’ “Credit Theory of Money” (1914), highlight the deliberate use of convoluted language to obscure financial and political realities​​. Similarly, judicial decisions, like Hoy v. State (96 N.W. 228), illustrate the courts’ recognition of the need to differentiate between actors and their roles​.

 

Conclusion

The phrase “No Undercover FBI Employees Were Present” is a quintessential example of weaponized language—a deceptive half-truth masquerading as transparency. The deliberate exclusion of “agents” from this statement is a glaring omission that insults the intelligence of anyone capable of parsing the law. It exploits semantic technicalities to evade accountability, a tactic that must be exposed for what it is: an act of deliberate obfuscation with potential legal and ethical ramifications.

This is not merely a matter of linguistic nuance; it is a stark reminder of the responsibility borne by those who wield words in positions of power. The law demands precision, honesty, and accountability—not gamesmanship.

---

 

Decoding of Your “Slick Willy’s” PSA
and the Satanic (śāṭān/Σατανᾶς/שָׂטָן) Legal-Industry’s “Legalese”, and its Roman/Italiano, Mercantile, Lex Mercatoria/Law Merchant as not only “wise”, but sharply analytical of ABSOLUTE merit, Power, and Altruistic Authority:

 

1. Exposing Legalese as a Weaponized Tool:

• • Legalese is a willful and intentional Satanic/Talmudic tool utilized by the terroristic British Crown’s “Legal Society” which employs complexity to obscure meaning, creating a linguistic barrier that disenfranchises those not “initiated” into its commercial death/debt-based cult and its peculiar jargon. By interpreting the quote as a “PSA”, this Author herein exposes and highlights its function as a warning that the word games embedded in “legal language” are designed to entrap rather than enlighten and as such, we herein challenge ANY B.A.R.-tool and or so-called “judge” to prove us wrong with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and NOT Your feelings, opinions or beliefs as those have NOTHING to do with actual/true LAW.
  • The “Legal Society’s” reliance on words like “understand” and their implied “submission/consent”(“stand under”) is emblematic of their toxic manipulations. Recognizing this is the first step toward rejecting their Satanic (שָׂטָן) commercial systems that seek to compel compliance through deceptive language.

2. Rejection of Title 42’s Framework:

• • The repugnant, communistic/Marxist/Satanic Pauline Christianity/Vatican-esque ideology of the “Public Health and Welfare” as found in the corporation’s U.S. Code^© [Title 42] which, is not nor ever was applicable to this man/Author, IN FACT and IN DEED, represents a “public administrative framework” and is nothing but a structure of statutory indentured servitude leveraged upon all the men and women who volunteer and consent/contract to be a “14^th Amendment “U.S. citizen”, “Registered Voter”, and “Voluntarily Compliant Taxpayer” and, against all those who seek the measly table scraps known as “Benefits” and “Privileges” handed down to them by their corporate/commercial/banking overlords known as things like: “V.A. Benefits”, “EBT cards”, “Disability Insurance”, “Unemployment Insurance”, “Social Security Retirement Benefits”, “Obama Care”, “MediCare/MediCaid” etc. So, this Author’s treatment of Clinton’s as a “PSA” serves as a spotlight on the toxic mechanics of such systems, and again, I herein challenge ANY B.A.R.-tool to show me where I err in any of this so as I may repent and correct my ways because, and till then, I stand with absolute and resolute merit exposing your filthy “Legalese” as the tool it is perpetuating UNLAWFUL and immoral control over “the People” and their posterity.

3. Grasping Legalese as a Tactic of Deception:

• • This Author’s exposé aligns with the irrefutable FACT that legalese is a sophisticated and Satanic (“accuser”) word-wizardry tool for obfuscation which exploits the lack of comprehension among the public (cesspool). That said, this Author has spent well-over two (2) decades studying the “Occult” and the “Mystery Schools” and is indeed a “Word Wizard” as well, because, I possess the knowledge You (“debtors” and “Trustees”) “Legal Society BAR members” and “Ecclesiastical Cult Members” obfuscate from the proletariat, unwashed masses and feudal serfs. The difference between people like You (“debtors” and “Trustees”) and men like me is, I and the “others” do NOT use this occult knowledge to “capitalize” (capitalism, CAP-stone, CAPITAL name) on our fellow man so ultimately, my viewing this quote as a “PSA” is a powerful lens as it communicates the necessity of vigilance and precision in decoding such language used by You (“debtors” and “Trustees”) being the Communistic, Corporatist, CAPITAL-ists You are.

4. a Tool for Awakening Awareness:

• • Framing the quote as a “PSA” underscores our absolute intent to awaken my fellow man to the reality that language is ALWAYS and has always been wielded as a weapon in Your “legal fictions” and fictional “State/Church systems” because, Your interplay between seemingly innocuous words like “is” reveals Your—not mine—strategic use of ambiguity to undermine clarity, truth, and self-actualized autonomy which is a divine and inalienable right of EVERY man.

5. Calling Out the Public “Cesspool”:

• • This Author’s emphasis on the “Public Cesspool” intentionally underlines the contrast between those who blindly accept Your repugnant legal fiction structures and those who critically examine and wholeheartedly and mindfully reject Your manipulative and repugnant constructs.
  • Therefore, this is a “Call to Arms” (see below) to my fellow Non-Commercial, Non-Capitalist/Communistic, Non-Ecclesiastical fellow man to recognize and grasp the true nature of the Satanic systems they navigate.

In decoding the quote this way, I herein willfully and intentionally freely serve as a herald for those willing to challenge the Satanic commercial frameworks of legalese. I herein communicate this deeper message and Bigger Truth that “language”, when misused, is a tool of subjugation, and only through critical comprehension can one reclaim their sovereignty and clarity.

Now before any of you filthy and Satanic Agents of the State/Church salivate all over yourselves and think to yourselves… “ohhhh… we got Eric now because he’s advocating for violence in my use of “Call to Arms”…  I suggest you stop creaming your pants and slow down because, it is a well-established FACT that I am a Pacifist with freedoms akin to Diplomatic Immunity and I am NOT your “gun-loving, Marlboro man, Patriot, redneck, militia member, J6er, Republic Restorer” etc. So,  in lawful terms herein is the actual meaning of “call to arms”:

Key Elements in a Lawful Context:

1. Assertion of Sovereignty: A call to arms is a lawful (again, not Your “legal”) appeal for men and women to assert their sovereign rights and resist all Your legal industry’s unlawful impositions through peaceful, rhetorical, and strategic means.
2. Defense of Rights: The “arms” in question are indeed tools of advocacy such as Writs of Quo Warranto and NOTICE of DEMANDS to your repugnant industry and Administrations as the Pen/word is mightier than Your repugnant swords You pass out to Your FBI Agents, U.S. Marshals, Corporate POLICY Enforcers, etc.
3. Nonviolent and Lawful Action: In a lawful sense, a “call to arms” emphasizes adherence to peaceful measures and established Lawful principles and Maxims while resisting Your industry’s and Sick society’s oppression and iniquity. As again… “It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society”. ~ Jiddu Krishnamurti
   
4. Historical and Contextual Use: In historical frameworks, it refers to literal defense under the doctrine of necessity or self-preservation, but in modern interpretations, it is often figurative and focuses on mobilizing lawful and rightful actions juxtapositioned against the filthy and Satanic Church’s/State’s Canons and “legalities”.
5. Constitutional Implications: The right to petition, pacifistically assemble, or engage in lawful and righteous resistance falls within the purview of being divinely gifted by the Most-High and Creator of all the universe and therefore inalienable not to mention recognized and protected by the Constitution(s) which bind ALL You Public Servants/Trustees and not I nor any of the other Private People (men and women).

In essence, a lawful “call to arms” is a metaphor for men and women to self-actualize and then on their own accord/singularly and/or collectively act to safeguard their freedom and challenge injustice, and affirm their lawful authority and power which stand far above and beyond any of the Satanic Church’s/State’s Administrative/Ministerial presumptions and assumptions.

---

 

Attention: @FBI, @DoJ, @DoD, @USMSDDC, @American Bar Association (ABA), @American Judges Associations (AJA) @American Defense League (ADL), Pope Francis @Pontifex, @VaticanNews, @newhartfordpd, et al.