[vc_row margin_top=”-50″][vc_column][bsf-info-box icon=”fas fa-book” icon_size=”32″ icon_color=”#ffffff” icon_style=”circle” icon_color_bg=”#dd8a0d” title=”PsyOp” pos=”square_box” box_border_style=”double” box_border_width=”1″ box_border_color=”#757575″ box_bg_color=”#e2e2e2″ title_font_size=”desktop:24px;”]Operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. [/bsf-info-box][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]A recent Reuters investigation may indicate that “Q Anon” was in fact an FBI cyber psyop.
‘Q-Anon’ Bears Striking Resemblance to Bolshevik Psy-Op From 1920s Known as ‘Operation Trust’
The “Q Anon” phenomenon has generally been regarded as a hoax or prank, originated by online message board users in late October 2017, that got out of control. The “Q Anon” persona was preceded by similar personae, including “FBI anon”, “CIA anon” and “White House insider anon”.
“Q Anon” originally called himself “Q clearance patriot”. Former CIA counterintelligence operative Kevin M. Shipp explained that an actual “Q clearance leaker” – i.e. someone possessing the highest security clearance at the US Department of Energy, required to access top secret nuclear weapons information – would have been identified and removed within days.
These alleged “Russian social media accounts”, posing as accounts of American patriots, were in contact with politically conservative U.S. YouTubers and drew their attention to the “Q Anon” persona. This is how, in early November 2017, the “Q Anon” movement took off.
But given the recent revelations by British investigator David J. Blake – who for the first time was able to conclusively show, at the technical level, that the “Russian hacking” operation was a cyber psyop run by the FBI and FBI cyber security contractor CrowdStrike.
Of note, U.S. cyber intelligence firm New Knowledge, founded by former NSA and DARPA employees and tasked by the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, in 2018, with investigating alleged “Russian social media operations” relating to the 2016 U.S. presidential election, was itself caught faking a “Russian social media botnet” in order to influence the 2017 Alabama senate race.
If the “Q Anon” persona – similar to the Guccifer2.0 “Russian hacker” persona played by an FBI cyber security contractor – was indeed an FBI psychological operation, its goal may have been to take control of, discredit and ultimately derail the supporter base of U.S. President Trump. In this case, the “Q Anon” movement may have been a modern version of the original FBI COINTELPRO program.
Contrary to some media claims, the person or people behind the “Q Anon” persona have never been identified. Some media speculated that James Watkins, the owner of the 8chan/8kun message board, on which “Q” was posting his messages, might be “Q” or might be linked to “Q”, but Watkins denied this. In September 2020, the owner of QMap, a website aggregating “Q” messages, was identified as a Citigroup employee, but again no actual link to “Q” could be established.
Postscript
Contrary to some media claims, the person/people behind “Q Anon” have never been identified. Some media speculated that James Watkins, the owner of the 8chan/8kun message board, on which “Q” was posting his messages, might be “Q” or might be linked to “Q”, but Watkins denied this. In September 2020, the owner of QMap, a website aggregating “Q” messages, was identified as a Citigroup employee, but again no actual link to “Q” could be established.
Related
- “Q Anon” resembles Soviet “Operation Trust”
(Information Liberation, January 2020)
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
